AI fraud detection that lives in your stack, not on a vendor's roadmap. Shipped from Washington.

Our goal is to give Seattle businesses a three-day weekend, so people can spend more time with their families and the people they love :)

The reason we take on work in Seattle is that the businesses here tend to be sharper about what they want than the brief lets on. AI fraud detection for a Seattle team almost always ends up looking different to AI fraud detection for a downtown Auckland one.

What AI fraud detection actually does

Pattern-watching AI for refund abuse, chargebacks, fake reviews, employee fiddles, and odd supplier invoices. Flags weirdness early - before it's a real problem.

  • 01 Learns your normal patterns and flags outliers
  • 02 Daily anomaly report, not a constant alert flood
  • 03 Explainable scoring so you can act with confidence
  • 04 Integrates with Xero, Shopify, and POS systems

Built on: Claude DuckDB Postgres Vercel

What you actually get

Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. This is what is in the box.

How AI fraud detection compares

The two things most businesses do instead, and where each one runs out.

 Hiring for itAn off-the-shelf toolKiwi Dynamics
Fit to how you workFits perfectly, costs a salaryYou bend your process to suit the toolBuilt around the workflow you already run
Time to something usefulImmediate, and permanentQuick to switch on, slow to make fitA working slice in weeks, then hardened
Who owns the dataYou doThe vendor, on the vendor's termsYou do, in your own accounts
When it breaksThat person sorts it, if they are inA support queue and a ticket numberThe people who built it
What it costsA salary, every year, foreverPer seat, forever, used or notScoped and quoted up front

Our field notes from Seattle builds.

  • Seattle runs on cloud computing, aerospace and coffee, home to the companies whose infrastructure half the internet's AI runs on - AI here means holding up to serious technical scrutiny.
  • Two of the world's largest cloud providers are headquartered here alongside a major aerospace manufacturing base. Seattle businesses, even small ones, tend to have someone on staff who can and will check your work.

We work with teams across Seattle: Downtown Seattle · Capitol Hill · Bellevue · Fremont · Ballard · Redmond.

Talk to us about this →

How we build AI fraud detection for a Seattle team.

We scope narrow, ship a working pilot, then harden it into production. The first slice is the highest-leverage workflow for your Seattle business, so value lands before the build is finished. AI fraud + anomaly.

Talk to us

How the work runs

The outcome for Seattle teams

Recovers 3-5x its cost in caught fraud within 6 months. For Seattle teams, that almost always shows up as fewer interruptions and a calmer week, not a dashboard chart.

Not your typical AI agency.

Honest about what AI can and cannot do

Ships the one workflow that pays for itself

Hours given back, never the size of the invoice

Start a conversation

*Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. Results vary by workflow and business.

How much is not automating costing you?

Nine hours a week of admin is 468 hours a year. With Kiwi Dynamics, that drops to about 52.

Try the calculator

*Based on 9 hours a week of admin at Kiwi Dynamics' typical 80% automation rate. Your number may vary, the calculator uses your own.

FAQ

What's the realistic timeline for AI fraud detection with a Seattle?

Most Seattle businesses have their first usable slice in week 5 or 6. We'd rather ship narrow and real than broad and aspirational - your team gets to use the thing well before the engagement is "done".

What does AI fraud detection cost for a Seattle?

Pilots start from a fixed scope priced to land a measurable result inside 6 weeks. Pricing depends on data volume, integration complexity, and whether you need us on managed services afterwards. We'll quote precisely after a 30-minute scoping call.

Anyone else in this space using AI fraud detection?

Plenty. Recovers 3-5x its cost in caught fraud within 6 months. The interesting question is rarely "does it work" - it's "is your team ready to use the output." That's what we'd scope on the call.

What happens if we want to swap a vendor out later?

AI fraud detection is built behind a small adapter layer specifically so swapping a model provider or a data source is a one-day job, not a re-architecture. Claude, DuckDB, Postgres, Vercel are our defaults, but the build is intentionally portable.

One short call.

Tell us what you're trying to fix. We'll come back inside a working day.

Talk to us about this

Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll reply with how we'd build it - no obligation.